More VARs Joining Federal Open-Source BandwagonGovernment's growing use of the technology allows resellers to build a new revenue stream The federal governments widespread and growing use of open-source technology during the past few years has created new business opportunities for VARs that have become more involved in the frenzied contract bidding for services, security and support. By bidding open source applications, VARs can cut their costs and their bids, said Shawn McCarthy, director of research for government vendor programs at Government Insights, an IDC company. McCarthy warned, however, that delivering open-source solutions can be a double-edged sword for the channel because VARs have to be prepared to do more support and maintenance that they would with proprietary software. However, such a scenario is just fine with many VARs, as long as they can charge for those services. Open source in the federal government is fast-growing and pervasive, said Rick Marcotte, CEO, DLT Solutions, a Herndon, Virginia-based VAR that specializes in selling, implementing and supporting open-source solutions for state, local and federal government agencies. The largest federal government open source adopter is the Department of Defense (DoD), which has the highest IT budget in the government and is the department most focused on security, he said. It was the slowest to adopt until open-source security was vastly improved. A few years ago, developers at the National Security Agency hardened the kernel of the Linux OS, giving it the fireproof security government and enterprise IT folks wanted, said Marcotte. While that enhancement of Linux did not single-handedly transform the open- source federal market, it had a huge impact. Open source became credible in government once the DoD started to consider it seriously a few years ago, said Craig Abod, president of Carahsoft, a Reston, Virginia-based VAR that has built a government practice around open source. Government agencies now understand the value of open source and the subscription model, which they didnt understand three or four years ago." Federal interest in open source is grounded in the technologys benefits, Abod added. The government knows that open-source technology is a cost-effective, secure way to deploy and build products in mission-critical environments." The federal governments appetite for open-source technology is reflected in the findings of a recent study of federal market adoption rates. The Federal Open Source Referendum study found that 71 percent of respondents believe their agency could benefit from open source, while 58 percent are more likely to consider moving to open source as they consolidate their data centers. The studys findings are based on an online survey of 218 federal civilian, DoD and intelligence agency IT decision-makers. The study was done by the Federal Open Source Alliance, an organization devoted to open-source education. The alliance is supported by Hewlett-Packard, Intel, Red Hat and others. Another report, published more than a year ago by IDCs Government Insights unit, predicted that the Linux share of the U.S. governments enterprise server market will rise from 11.6 percent in 2004 to 15.2 percent by 2009. Just four years ago, Linuxs share hovered around 3 percent, the report states. His own business is growing at about 40 percent annually, Marcotte added, with revenue coming from various sources such as reselling Red Hat support, assisting with implementations, ongoing engagements, and training and education courses. Last September, DLTs government business got a massive shot in the arm when the Department of Energy (DOE) awarded the company a blanket purchase agreement (BPA) with a ceiling of $45 million and a five-year term. The first schedule attached to the BPA includes Red Hat products and services. TAGS: open source,Linux,Intel,Red Hat,government Channel Solutions
Channel News| Contact Herman Mehling | Back to top |
Solutions in a Small World (Latin America): Sealed with a KissEven in today’s Internet-dominated world, in-person business connections still make strong impressions. But face-to-face marketers must be aware of cultural disconnects, explains AMD’s Gerald Youngblood. |

